Physician input leads to fairness

Medical schedule. Doctors work schedule vector illustration. Clinic team, agenda, hospital staff characters. Medical doctor appointment, medicine schedule service

Hospitals often rely on Fair Market Value (FMV) surveys to help them determine how much to pay physicians for services like taking unassigned call. While these surveys are a good place to start, they’re also problematic. Most of the hospitals we visit would only be able to pay a few specialties at FMV rates, and doing so would not only deplete their budget, it would exclude other equally-burdened specialties, fostering an environment of resentment.

 

FMV: it’s only fair if there’s enough to go around

 

Since not everyone can be paid at FMV, decisions have to be made regarding who should be paid, and how much their per diems are going to be. Unfortunately, most administrations do not have a standardized process in place for making these decisions. The specialties that are most vocal in demanding to be paid are often the ones who end up receiving call pay. This inevitably pits specialties against one another and erodes trust between administration and staff. Without a defensible process in place, it’s hard to justify why some burdened specialties are not included in a hospital’s call pay program.

At MaxWorth, we believe there’s a more inclusive, transparent, and fair way to determine who gets paid for taking call: Get input from your doctors. 

 

The Physicians’ Call Committee

 

The Physicians’ Call Committee brings  physicians together to establish a fairness standard for call pay rates at their hospital. This standard is based on each specialty’s call burden taking into account criteria such as the frequency and intensity of their unassigned call. 

The committee gives physicians a voice in the decision-making process and provides them with a platform to openly discuss the needs of the emergency department with their peers. It also removes the lack of transparency that so often breeds contempt when call pay is handled with single-specialty negotiations. Not only is this a fairer approach, it also limits the number of call-pay related issues administrators have to face. 

 

Fairness trumps dollar amounts 

 

Having a process in place for determining a call pay budget can create fairness, but it cannot make everyone happy. When physicians better understand one another’s call burdens, they often choose to include as many specialties as possible even if it means that everyone earns a little less. The committee establishes a sense of community through a shared goal of building a fair program. Physicians walk away from the experience with an appreciation for the fact that their own call pay per diem has been established in a fair manner, even if the dollar amount isn’t what they initially hoped for. Even those who aren’t included in the program tend to accept the outcomes because they know their burden was taken into consideration and that the results were arrived at through a standardized process. 

 

Learn More

 

To learn more about MaxWorth’s Physicians’ Call Committee, download our white paper, Call Pay Solution: Stabilizing budgets with a fair and sustainable approach. Or, if you’d like to speak to a physician who has served as a call committee leader, we’d be happy to put you in touch with one. 

REQUEST OUR WHITE PAPER:

Complete the form below and receive a copy of our latest white paper, Call Pay Solution: Stabilizing call budgets with a fair and sustainable approach

Something went wrong. Please check your entries and try again.

Want to Learn More?

Struggling healthcare organizations need sustainable solutions

Struggling healthcare organizations need sustainable solutions The economic impact of the pandemic has been hardest on hospitals in rural and underserved communities, many of which were already struggling to remain viable due to pre-pandemic financial strain.     Mercy Hospital, the oldest in Chicago, announced this week that it has…

Curbing ED costs could save rural hospitals

Curbing ED costs could save rural hospitals A recent study confirms that rural hospitals are threatened by significant financial instability. Out of the country’s 1,844 rural hospitals, 453 are vulnerable to closure. In fact, nearly 50% are operating in the red, and this number is steadily increasing, evidenced by the…

The rising cost of call pay can be unsustainable, even for large health systems

The rising cost of call pay can be unsustainable, even for large health systems The rising cost of call pay is well documented. According to a 2014 Sullivan Cotter survey, the average hospital’s call pay expense rose 50% from 2012-2014, and it has continued to rise in the years since.…

Call Pay: An Unlikely Path to Financial Stability

Call Pay: An Unlikely Path to Financial Stability The traditional approach to call pay allows the expense to become an unpredictable liability. Since the passage of EMTALA, there has been a steady increase in physician demands for call compensation. Hospitals often feel they have no choice but to give in…