Hospital pay equity: it all comes down to fairness
Becker's Hospital Review recently reported that a clinical psychologist has sued Northern Light Acadia Hospital in Bangor, Maine after learning that her salary was nearly half that of her male colleagues. While she was earning $50 an hour, the men were earning $90 or $95 an hour. After she approached her administration about the discrepancy, they admitted to finding “pay discrepancies across the hospital,” and proposed to adjust the hourly wage for all psychologists to $57 while allowing her male colleagues to continue to earn $90 and $95 an hour for a period of time in order to “ease their transition.” The doctor expressed her disappointment over the proposed solution. In the end, she was told to take the matter to the hiring manager, who allegedly told her, “What do you want me to do, go through every inequality I found and reimburse everyone?"
A far-reaching issue
Pay equity is a pressing issue. And when people think of pay discrepancies, they think of situations like the one at Northern Light Acadia, of women being paid unfairly. Unfortunately, in the healthcare industry, this issue goes beyond gender inequality. Medical staffs are often divided on issues regarding pay discrepancies among specialties, practice groups, and even locations. More and more, hospitals are being called upon to consider the fairness of their pay culture.
Working with healthcare organizations for the past 15 years, our team has seen firsthand how disruptive this issue can be, especially when the compensation in question is related to taking call. Disputes over call pay can cause hospitals to lose service lines in their emergency departments, impacting access to care in their communities. Given all that’s at stake, it might be tempting to offer quick and easy solutions to make the problem go away.
Solutions have to be fair, not fast
When it comes to compensation disputes, no solution is going to work unless it solves the root cause of the problem: unfairness. After all, offers were made to the psychiatrist at Northern Light Acadia, but none of them addressed the lack of fairness at the heart of the issue; and therefore, they did nothing to heal the divide between the physician and her administration. In fact, they made it much worse.
When it comes to call pay, hospitals typically deal with disputes that arise one at a time, negotiating with specialties that are demanding to be paid or to be paid more. These negotiations don’t address the issue of fairness, and so they inevitably fall short and often make matters worse.
Transparency builds trust
Single-specialty negotiations erode trust between administrators and physicians due to a lack of transparency. Physicians are often under the impression that specialty groups with the most political sway end up with more than their fair share of the call pay budget. So, even if a particular specialty is satisfied with the outcome of a negotiation, the hospital’s culture and working relationships are negatively impacted. In this environment, agitation around the issue of call pay will not disappear.
Achieve transparency through participation
At MaxWorth, we believe the first step in establishing fairness in any hospital compensation program is to create transparency by inviting physicians to participate in the decision-making process. That’s why the first phase of our Call Pay Solution is the establishment of a Physicians' Call Committee made up of representatives from a wide range of specialties. MaxWorth brings to the table our years of experience building call pay programs at healthcare organizations across the country, and physicians bring their experience taking call at their facility, which is unique for every specialty, and in every community. Together, we work with the hospital’s administration to arrive at a fairness standard for all call pay rates.
The power of process
We’ve only come across one hospital that pays all specialties the same rate for covering call. More often, a hospital's call compensation is linked to burden. Given that there’s a finite amount of money available in a call pay budget, it’s inevitable that decisions regarding which specialties are paid and how much they are paid have to be made. The only way to make sure a call pay program is fair is to put a standardized process in place for arriving at these decisions. A Physicians’ Call Committee can ensure that the burden of every specialty is considered and weighed against the burdens of others. Furthermore, a committee can continue to monitor a program and review it annually so that it remains fair in the face of change.
With a standardized process in place, physicians no longer feel as though they are in competition with one another for the same call pay dollars. Even though everyone isn’t paid the same amount, they understand that the program has been established fairly. Typically, this alleviates agitation around call pay, strengthens working relationships between physicians, and improves alignment between administrations and medical staffs.
We can help
All aspects of hospital pay are under increased scrutiny. It’s better to take the time to evaluate the fairness of your pay culture than to wait until a discrepancy is called into question. To learn more about our Physicians’ Call Committee and Call Pay Solution, download our latest white paper.
REQUEST OUR WHITE PAPER:
Complete the form below and receive a copy of our latest white paper, Call Pay Solution: Stabilizing call budgets with a fair and sustainable approach
Want to Learn More?
Benefit offerings can help your practice safeguard its autonomy Many physicians enjoy the autonomy provided by private practices. A 2019 McKinsey survey reported that 79% of small independent practitioners and 67% of large independent practitioners cited autonomy as a major factor in their choice to remain self-employed at a time…
COVID exasperates the issue of physician burnout. To help your providers, start with a conversation. MaxWorth works with many hospitals and health care providers in rural communities. We’ve observed first hand the kind of stress these facilities face due to physician shortages. It’s not uncommon for physicians in these communities…
The cascading impact of call coverage disputes In early September, Community Regional Medical Center in Fresno, CA was given 48 hours to resolve a contract dispute that had resulted in the loss of neurosurgery coverage in their emergency department. If they had failed to resume coverage, they would have lost…
Telemedicine’s impact on call pay COVID has brought about the widespread adoption of telemedicine. This technology can be a lifeline, particularly for smaller and rural facilities. For example, KershawHealth in Camden, South Carolina has thrived since it implemented a sophisticated telehealth system after losing many of its specialists to bigger…