Ambulance diversion and the struggle to secure 365 coverage

Print

Last week, a bill was introduced in congress that would require hospitals to report instances of diversion. Failure to do so would result in funding cuts. Diversion is the practice of turning away ambulances when an emergency department is full. The practice has been around for a long time, but it has recently fallen under scrutiny after a number of studies have shown its negative effects on patient safety. The studies also show that minority, low-income, and elderly patients are the ones most affected. 

 

Diverting due to coverage gaps

 

Patients are shipped to nearby hospitals not only in cases of overcrowding, but also when there are gaps in a hospital’s call coverage. The increased scrutiny on diversion is likely to shine a light on coverage gaps. 

 

During a recent call committee meeting, I spoke with a hospital CMO about how imperative 365 coverage is to our communities. As the CMO pointed out, most organizations’ bylaws exempt physicians from having to take call at a specified age or after a certain number of years of service. Therefore, it’s possible to have a small number of physicians taking call in a given specialty even if there are plenty of others on staff. Physicians are typically scheduled 1 and 3 according to the unofficial rule followed by most emergency departments. Adhering to this rule while upholding the organization’s bylaws, it’s often impossible to achieve 365 coverage. At smaller hospitals with no residency programs and aging physician populations, staffing 365 coverage is and will continue to be particularly challenging. 

 

Securing 365 coverage

 

At MaxWorth, we’ve been working with healthcare professionals for the past fifteen years. During this time, the struggle to staff emergency departments has proven to be one of the enduring challenges in a constantly changing industry. We believe our Call Pay Solution can help organizations secure 365 coverage. The program makes call compensation more meaningful for physicians, and it ensures the sustainability of an organization’s call compensation program for years to come. To learn how our Call Pay Solution can help you secure call coverage, click here

 

REQUEST OUR WHITE PAPER:

Complete the form below and receive a copy of our latest white paper, Call Pay Solution: Stabilizing call budgets with a fair and sustainable approach

Something went wrong. Please check your entries and try again.

Want to Learn More?

The enduring rise of call pay doesn’t have to be a liability

The enduring rise of call pay doesn’t have to be a liability When MaxWorth first created the Call Pay Solution, on-call compensation was one of the most contentious topics in healthcare. At a time when more and more physicians were demanding to be paid for call, most administrators were reluctant…

The Anonymous Physician on Retention

The Anonymous Physician:  Physician Retention The Anonymous Physician column provides physicians with a platform to discuss pressing issues in healthcare. From time to time, we pose a question to a doctor, or a group of doctors, and post their answers anonymously, giving them the freedom to be frank and uninhibited.…

Aligning executive compensation can aid in hospitals’ recovery

Aligning executive compensation can aid in hospitals’ recovery Healthcare organizations are looking to their boards to help guide them through the transition into a post-pandemic world. Becker’s recently highlighted the top five concerns healthcare boards have as they plan for recovery and a return to normal. One of them is…

Physician input leads to fairness

Physician input leads to fairness Hospitals often rely on Fair Market Value (FMV) surveys to help them determine how much to pay physicians for services like taking unassigned call. While these surveys are a good place to start, they’re also problematic. Most of the hospitals we visit would only be…